-
Website
http://thedistrictweekly.com/ -
Original page
http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/up-in-smokescreen/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
PatBryant
105 comments · 1 points
-
howardx
1158 comments · 403 points
-
Sam_Lowry
73 comments · 15 points
-
Fisch
77 comments · 25 points
-
Dwight K Snider
163 comments · 14 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
TWO JOBS FOR ONE MONEY
2 days ago · 42 comments
-
DEADLY FORCE
1 week ago · 134 comments
-
HOW RECENT MEDPOT DEVELOPMENTS MAY—OR MAY NOT—FIT TOGETHER
17 hours ago · 6 comments
-
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR CRAIG BECK HAS BEEN REASSIGNED
5 days ago · 54 comments
-
IN 2004, GABELICH, REYES URANGA & RICHARDSON TOOK AN EXCELLENT VACATION, TOO
1 week ago · 90 comments
-
TWO JOBS FOR ONE MONEY
Personally, I'd pay the increased cost for my remaining student to have the Camp Hi Hill experience.
If Diana can't see it, if Diana cannot understand it, it JUST CAN'T BE!
The negative economic outcome of our open border policy, I'm afraid, goes beyond the abstractions for your political beliefs, and carries into the real world of our overwhelmed educational system, and if that's boring to you, perhaps you should abstain from reading the comments section, and take up needlepoint.
It's very relaxing for certain kinds of people, I am told.
If I may, let me momentarily take a page out of your playbook, aka. "Let's take great liberties in logic and common sense in order to sway the undecided folks."
According to our hereby ordained "Border Czar Jason", if you're poor, you're here illegally. If your folks cannot afford an apartment other than in the LB-DMZ, well, shucks, they must have walked here from El Salvador.
BCJ -- I'm abbreviating -- is that how it works?
If they (ie. inner city kids, regardless of their status) have a right to a publicly funded education, shouldn't they also have an equal right to have that education include a field trip to Camp Hi-Hill?
I'm thinking not, from a LBUSD perspective. I'm thinking that those underpriviliged folks have bigger fish to fry than to vent on websites or complain at Board of Education meetings.
Gee, I wonder whether the LBUSD Administrators know that all too well......
Lest you’ve forgotten, such children are, in point of fact, natural born United States citizens and just as deserving as you are of all of the rights and privileges offered by this greatest of nations.
In point of fact the children you mention provide a much-needed and extremely valuable link between our society and their immigrant parents and help the latter to acculturate far faster than they might otherwise.
Successful acculturation is key for such adult immigrants, regardless of legal status, because in accomplishing this they become far more productive and contributory to our society in their own right.
Argue that LBUSD just didn’t have the money to maintain its Special Use permit at Camp Hi Hill if you like. Argue that part of the reason LBUSD is cash-strapped is because our District serves a number of students who were born here to illegal immigrant parents if you must.
But to make a leap from those truths to a statement like “anchor babies…don’t pay for themselves” does everyone, especially yourself, a grave disservice and lends nothing intelligent to the dialog.
Your insistence upon repeatedly asserting such, and similar, fallacies speaks not only to what I feel is your ignorance but your bigotry as well.
I happen to join with Diana in her belief that LBUSD actually has all of the money it needs; it simply misspends a great deal of it. I lay the blame for this misfeasance squarely at the feet of our current LBUSD Board, which is charged with, among other things, the responsible fiscal management of our District.
Ultimately, however, we have no one to blame but ourselves for it is we, the electorate, that are ultimately responsible for the overall performance of all aspects of our government.
Wow, touche. I must admit that I like your wit. I do agree with you that illegal immigration has, and continues to create problems in myriad areas of our day to day living. However, I don't necessarily make the leap that all underprivileged kids are here illegally, nor do I believe that the school district can't afford to send kids to camp because of potential illegal immigrants. From what I can tell from previous posts, you appear to have almost a knee-jerk reaction to blame so-called "anchor babies" for every social ill, which makes me nervous. I start to wonder, then, what your possible solution might be: that ICE go into every elementary school classroom, hog-tie the kids and throw them into detention camps? My point is that there are other ways to tackle illegal immigration -- such as through tougher sanctions, beefed-up border control, etc. Also, it's critically important that we not forget that our elected officials and school district officials were major contributors to getting us in this financial mess in the first place. Why is it that enrollment keeps declining, yet they keep asking for more and more money? Might they need to do some serious cost cutting at the top? I only ask that you not give our elected officials and school administrators such an easy scapegoat.
Also, if 5th grade camp has been shortened due to budgetary issues and failed lease negotiations, then give it to us straight. I find that the whole truth is always better than putting forward a feel-good message that's only partly true. School district officials love to appear as if they are making every decision "for the kids.' But unfortunately, I don't believe that is always their primary motive.
By the way, my grandmother tried to teach me to needlepoint, and I was terrible at it. So, I'm afraid you're stuck with me.