The District Weekly - Latest Comments in SUPER CHOOSE DAY | The District Weekly

Re: SUPER CHOOSE DAY | The District Weekly

Chris Ziegler — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:46:51 -0000

choose HOWLIN RAIN this feb 6

Re: SUPER CHOOSE DAY | The District Weekly

Natalie — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:40:58 -0000

you guys are the best

Re: SUPER CHOOSE DAY | The District Weekly

drnoe — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:19:08 -0000

93 will go down in flames

Re: SUPER CHOOSE DAY | The District Weekly

rdm24 — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:12:15 -0000

The reasoning behind your positions is sometimes pretty awful.

Vote no on 93 because you don't like Perata and Nunez? Why not let their constituents decide if they like them or not?

Vote for the gaming compacts because they are opposed by other casinos?

Shouldn't we be voting based on the merits of the propositions, and not because of their backers?

That said, this voter's guide was hilarious.

Re: SUPER CHOOSE DAY | The District Weekly

D. Kelson — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:28:33 -0000

"Vote no and throw the scumbags out." Last time I checked, I don't get to vote for (or against) people in other districts. Term limits are a shitty way for "me" to get people from other districts out of office who I supposedly don't like. Get rid of term limits altogether. If there's a scumbag in office, let that person's constituents vote them out of office --- if the scumbag isn't serving their constituents well, that is. Don't kid yourself about term limits. They have turned our state government into a shitty(ier) cespool of mismanagement.

Re: SUPER CHOOSE DAY | The District Weekly

Andrew — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:10:11 -0000

I'm a big fan of the District, and am glad the District staffers made the migration from the OC Weekly here to LBC.

That said, shame on you for endorsing Prop. 94! I'm all for giving back to the Native Americans for the centuries of abuse and ignoring of their plight by our Federal Government, which is why I'll be voting yes on Props 95-97, but the rampant greed and powermongering among the Penchanga leadership that has led to their disenrolling hundreds of their own tribe members- against the advice of their own hired counsel- should not be rewarded or condoned by allowing 94 to pass.