Community Page
- thedistrictweekly.com Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Hello friends, Harry lead his last paper with two terrible pieces,July 09. One concerning the Port, where somehow the writer knows more about CEQA Law than the Statutes, Courts and Ordinances. What...
- Breathalyzers in bars is a good approach? You think it's a good idea to put the responsibility of policing drunk drivers on intoxicated bar patrons? In most bars those machines are only used...
- that is frustrating. not that this will make you feel any better but on the way to work this morning driving through huntington it was a disaster. people are just irresponsible. I would love to see...
- HightHat, The drunken problem on 2nd street has reached its peak because of the new alcohol liscenses (6 new ones in 3 years). Because there are now approx. 50 businesses approved to sell alcohol...
- My issue with the 2AM closinig time is that the LOUD, OBNOXIOUS DRUKEN CUSTOMERS of the bars make an insane amount of noise just stumbling to their cars and it happens right in front of my house....
1 year ago
That said, shame on you for endorsing Prop. 94! I'm all for giving back to the Native Americans for the centuries of abuse and ignoring of their plight by our Federal Government, which is why I'll be voting yes on Props 95-97, but the rampant greed and powermongering among the Penchanga leadership that has led to their disenrolling hundreds of their own tribe members- against the advice of their own hired counsel- should not be rewarded or condoned by allowing 94 to pass.
1 year ago
1 year ago
Vote no on 93 because you don't like Perata and Nunez? Why not let their constituents decide if they like them or not?
Vote for the gaming compacts because they are opposed by other casinos?
Shouldn't we be voting based on the merits of the propositions, and not because of their backers?
That said, this voter's guide was hilarious.
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago