The District Weekly - Latest Comments in SIXTH DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL RACE GETS INTRIGUING | The District Weekly

Re: SIXTH DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL RACE GETS INTRIGUING | The District Weekly

LBRez — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:15:44 -0000

Anyone who did not know about Andrews' past during the campaign to his election is either an idiot or chose not to be informed since there was a lot of coverage of his past drug use and conviction. These same people probably think reports that come up that Bill Clinton was a philanderer before his election to President, and after (and still is?), is a revelation of behavior they were unaware of at the time. If you choose not to be informed don't blame others for your ignorance.

Re: SIXTH DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL RACE GETS INTRIGUING | The District Weekly

Jesse Nelson — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:24:45 -0000

About the photo of Charlotte Gibson, its her and there's even a phone number.
Now hard is it to call her and confirm her statements?

About your question "didn’t voters already give Andrews a second chance?"
the answers is NO, because i bet most voters like me did not know he had been busted twice for drug dealing and drug use.

Dee should have made sure the voters knew about his past.
The Press Telegram stated that he "expunged" his felony conviction.
Now, that makes it really hard for us voters to know about someone criminal convictions.

I have no reason to doubt Ms. Gibson's statements, and neither do you.
I believe someone who lived with him as a wife for more than 10 years.

Thank you and her for making us aware about Dee's crooked past.

Re: SIXTH DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL RACE GETS INTRIGUING | The District Weekly

Tracy Kittinger — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:25:17 -0000

Hi,

It is my understanding that a former friend that Dee use to live with, was upset that Dee had won and wants to oust Dee.

I handled Dee's campaign last time and she got on the phone with me and went off!!!! Upset that Dee had won.