The District Weekly - Latest Comments in SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

835 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:06:15 -0000

Isn't this the same DiLoreto clan that unsuccesfully sued the Downey school district for refusing to post the Ten Commandments on a public school baseball field sign? Glad to see he's interpreting our laws...

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

Dwight K Snider — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:20:42 -0000

Citizen Journalist Quote of the Day: "Our legal system is based on the principle that an independent, fair, and competent judiciary will interpret and apply the laws that govern us. The role of the judiciary is central to American concepts of justice and the rule of law. Intrinsic to this code are the precepts that judges, individually and collectively, must respect and honor the judicial office as a public trust and strive to enhance and maintain confidence in our legal system."

(Source: Preamble to the California Code of Judicial Ethics.)

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

wswaim — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:23:37 -0000

Great point, Michael. In fairness, the judge called me today to say that my article was a "hatchet job." If he's right, he proves my point: most voters haven't got the time or expertise to make judgments about judges. I had two weeks and, if the judge is right, still screwed it up.

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

Michael — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:01:27 -0000

Your article doesn't mention that, unless he does his own typing, Di Loreto's improper correspondence was typed for him by a public employee paid by taxpayers. I don't recall giving him that permission. This is the type of misuse of office that, if it were done by a Democrat, would be considered grounds for indictment.

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

Michael — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:59:51 -0000