The District Weekly - Latest Comments in SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

Margie — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:53:24 -0000

Gee, I thought I was the only one that felt this way. My sister's comments are right on! I would only have to add that Joe's character traits are part of the
Di Loreto family tree. I truly expect him to one day win an Oscar. He is said to truly perform, on as well as off the bench. In closing I can only say....to know him is to love him....or not!

Wife #1

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

barbara thorn — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:44:08 -0000

Judge Di Loreto was married to my sister & our family knows him well. I totally agree that this guy is a 'dick' & is 'abrupt,' 'arrogant & 'imperious.'
He has no conscience & is self-centered & spoiled.

It is ashame that the public can't do anything about re electing judges like this.

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

1992Plaintiff — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:43:49 -0000

I like Judge DiLoreto. He has a confidence borne of experience and education that you just don't find very often. If he made errors of judgment, perhaps he is, at the root of it all, human and subject to the same condition that afflicts us all -- our humanity. With all of the education and time spent in the company of community leaders, and in front of attorneys while adjudicating civil and criminal suits you'd think Judge DiLoreto might have earned the right to a mulligan. But there will always be those who cannot overlook their personal agenda nor abandon their love of nitpicking to keep the Judge looking over his shoulder.

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

ised8utoo — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:31:37 -0000

What a lazy judge. Doesn't even listen to anything being said in his courtroom. I would certainly never vote for him. He doesn't want to work for the people only to serve himself.

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

835 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:06:15 -0000

Isn't this the same DiLoreto clan that unsuccesfully sued the Downey school district for refusing to post the Ten Commandments on a public school baseball field sign? Glad to see he's interpreting our laws...

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

Dwight K Snider — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:20:42 -0000

Citizen Journalist Quote of the Day: "Our legal system is based on the principle that an independent, fair, and competent judiciary will interpret and apply the laws that govern us. The role of the judiciary is central to American concepts of justice and the rule of law. Intrinsic to this code are the precepts that judges, individually and collectively, must respect and honor the judicial office as a public trust and strive to enhance and maintain confidence in our legal system."

(Source: Preamble to the California Code of Judicial Ethics.)

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

wswaim — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:23:37 -0000

Great point, Michael. In fairness, the judge called me today to say that my article was a "hatchet job." If he's right, he proves my point: most voters haven't got the time or expertise to make judgments about judges. I had two weeks and, if the judge is right, still screwed it up.

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

Michael — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:01:27 -0000

Your article doesn't mention that, unless he does his own typing, Di Loreto's improper correspondence was typed for him by a public employee paid by taxpayers. I don't recall giving him that permission. This is the type of misuse of office that, if it were done by a Democrat, would be considered grounds for indictment.

Re: SIX MORE YEARS! | The District Weekly

Michael — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:59:51 -0000