-
Website
http://thedistrictweekly.com/ -
Original page
http://thedistrictweekly.com/daily/writing-shotgun/mayor-on-lookout-for-conflict-of-interest-in-belmont-shore-bond/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
PatBryant
105 comments · 1 points
-
rino2
26 comments · 11 points
-
howardx
868 comments · 228 points
-
LB City Girl
455 comments · 103 points
-
Fisch
71 comments · 21 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
CITY TARGETS MARIJUANA DISPENSARY FOR VIOLATING ITS OWN BUSINESS LICENSE
6 days ago · 96 comments
-
MARCHESE IS RUNNING, BUT NOT HIS MOUTH
1 day ago · 10 comments
-
A SIMPLE FELONY
4 days ago · 28 comments
-
THE NOT-SO-GREAT LONG BEACH SMOKEOUT
1 week ago · 50 comments
-
TOUGH LOVE
2 weeks ago · 78 comments
-
CITY TARGETS MARIJUANA DISPENSARY FOR VIOLATING ITS OWN BUSINESS LICENSE
That mahood is sure arrogant. Could someone please tell her she doesn't own the city.
Belmont Shore residents owe a great deal of thanks to Mike Ruehle and Jm McCabe.
The following is the City Council Agenda item number 19 benign description from last night:
“Recommendation to adopt resolution affirming prior Resolutions of Intention relating to the City of Long Beach Community Facilities District No. 2007-2 (Belmont Shore), and calling for a public hearing on the District for Tuesday, August 5, 2008 at 5:00 p.m.”
How would anyone know that this change approved voting for a $5.8 million bond backed by the City (us residents) and also changes the way votes are counted in CFD1? Is this the transparency that our Mayor Foster frequently talks about? This item could have easily described the space shuttle launching from the Pike.
On March 3rd, second street commercial property owners voted against the original $5.8 million bond approved by the Belmont Shore Parking Commission headed by Chairman Lorbeer and Vice Chairman Schneiter. Unhappy with the result, Commissioners Lorbeer and Schneiter again solicited and received Councilman DeLong’s support to have another vote and also change the way the votes are counted in the future. City Council unanimously approved both. How is that not stuffing the ballot box?
The Mayor doesn’t need to look very far to find conflicts of interest. The Belmont Shore Parking Commission is the epitome of CONFLICT OF INTEREST. It has 7 Commissioners. 3 Commissioners, including Commissioners Lorbeer and Schneiter, are commercial property owners. 3 Commissioners are business owner tenants of Commission Chairman Lorbeer, and one Commissioner is supposed to be a resident representative recommended by the Belmont Shore Residents Association (BSRA). However, the BSRA was never consulted when the resident representative Commissioner was appointed last November. Since her Appointment, the resident representative Commissioner has consistently voted for Parking Commission actions that are opposite of the wishes of resident surveys. This group controls over $500,000 per year of public funds.
In addition to the inherent conflict of interest, these individuals also receive elite treatment from Councilman DeLong and City staff. Parking Commission Chairman Lorbeer has received 2 variances on his properties without going through a public hearing on either. Councilman DeLong also supported Commissioner Lorbeer’s receipt of a permanent (not 1 year temporary) entertainment license for his property, contrary to the recommendation of the police and the outcry from local residents opposed to the crime, noise and bar fights already existing. Moreover, Councilman DeLong appointed Commissioner Schneiter to a “secret” (nobody knew about it) Tot Lot committee which attempted to turn a children’s playground into a parking lot for Commissioner Schneiter’s nearby commercial properties. Like I said, the Mayor doesn't need to look too far.
Bottom line, Councilman DeLong has convinced the Mayor and City Council to sustain him in his one-sided support of 2nd street property owners. When 7 residents (including 4 boardmembers from two different residents associations) complained to City Council about the preferential treatment being given to the Parking Commissioners, Councilman DeLong told everyone in the Council Chamber that were all “malcontents.” I have been forced to take resident issues to the City Council meetings because Councilman DeLong refuses to meet with me, the President of the Residents Association (BSRA), to discuss resident issues.
I applaud Dave for providing this platform for people to understand what is going on in Belmont Shore. I hope our Mayor and City Council begin to pay attention.
On the basketball courts, we have often heard that he and some friends have been looking to kind of move away what some perceive as a ' nuisance', for a while?
Sadly, this sentiment began surfacing, and may in fact have grown, as soon as the inter league, city wide 'pick up' games blossomed over the decades. Not good., but, we have heard this again and again, so look into it. Those who invested next to the courts should continue to accept the benefits..., and the burdens. And if anyone has thinly veiled bias towards who uses public facilities, 'look out below !' LOL This has always been, and remains, odious at best and was remembered at the polls in 2006.
Politically, would anyone be shocked to see Gary doing a favor for a prior RNC mentor? Or, the "Old Guard'? Or, the monied minority? We are sorry but we still fear that he was basically 'hired' to carry their brief? But he still appears way in over his head.
Especially when he so often looks like the 'Deer caught in the headlights'... or as he giggles along... ineffectually?
Kudos to Bob for flagging this, that's why we elected him.
There are quiet, vast rumblings, away from the Yacht Club, LOL, that Gary should resign his seat to a smart, hardworking, fair long beach lover ...and stay on the golf course..with the families money, .or just go back to PV and waste their time
. In a way, he is, or has been kind of working for, or with, the greedy few who gave us "Wrong Beach' hasn't he ? Isn't he right there with the geniuses who gave us he worst air in America, and the least desireable beaches in California?. Let's keep looking, patiently, and prudently..
Many of us are waiting for him to wake up and realize that he has in all likelihood, again ,been 'played like a violin' by key players on his Comittee to elect. Nothing new here.. He should become a better student of local history, for he will probably be used and discarded as soon as he is no longer profitable, as so many others have..
Regardless, his having upset so many, for so long, and having done basically nothing, should thankfully make him another 'One termer', if not the 'Recall target'..
Stay tuned...stay involved.
If he would only listen, and be fair to all us tax payers...,Don't hold your breath!
Finally, our City has excellent Attorneys and investigators, they'll get to the bottom of all of this. Personally and professionally, I admire them and we need always be their eyes and ears? Correct?.
Mike, I work in the port, and when I worked nights for a few months I'd come home down 2nd Street around 1-2:30 am. You would be amazed at all the fist fights I saw, and the weird sh*t, not to mention the rowdy behaviour of the young inebriates. You'd think there would be a requirement for the bars to have some (or more?) security. It's not a safe place, and I sure am glad I don't live close to the Street.