-
Website
http://thedistrictweekly.com/ -
Original page
http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/lowenthology/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
PatBryant
105 comments · 1 points
-
howardx
1158 comments · 403 points
-
Sam_Lowry
73 comments · 15 points
-
Fisch
77 comments · 25 points
-
Dwight K Snider
163 comments · 14 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
TWO JOBS FOR ONE MONEY
2 days ago · 42 comments
-
DEADLY FORCE
1 week ago · 134 comments
-
HOW RECENT MEDPOT DEVELOPMENTS MAY—OR MAY NOT—FIT TOGETHER
17 hours ago · 6 comments
-
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR CRAIG BECK HAS BEEN REASSIGNED
5 days ago · 54 comments
-
IN 2004, GABELICH, REYES URANGA & RICHARDSON TOOK AN EXCELLENT VACATION, TOO
1 week ago · 90 comments
-
TWO JOBS FOR ONE MONEY
The packing of the process with paid staffers, people who have benefited from their Lowenthal connections, and family members is really an expression of insecurity and lack in confidence that the "ordinary" dem's would do the right thing. There is just something very undemocratic and anti-progressive about this approach to politics. The city is too big and the issues too important to leave it to just one family political machine. Let’s turn the page.
(Source: Theodore Roosevelt's 1906 Muckraker Speech)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muckraker"
I guess if you screw them or marry them they cant testify against you.
The more I read and study about this whole Lowenthology article, the more and more I believe in the corruption of the political system in Long Beach and within the Lowenthal family.
I've seen some pretty sad and disrespectful displays and practices at public meetings from Bonnie Lowenthal (and her entire camp for that matter), and frankly, I wouldn't want to force anyone in Sacramento (and the State of California) to endure more bad politicans.
The idea that this article is not meant to infer scandal is laughable. Then why the blacked out faces, the chart? I understand the need for a catchy graphic but please don’t insult my intelligence. It is your site and there is no rule that you be objective but a little intellectual honesty would be nice.
Socalqueer, I was hoping that you could help me out. Do you consider yourself more of a racist or a sexist? I am leaning more towards the latter. You claim to know all of the candidates in the race yet you completely discount Bonnie Lowenthal’s many years of elected experience and say she is just living off her ex-husbands last name. As far as I see it, that is a blatantly sexist remark. I won’t even touch the “white woman” comment.
Where is the proof in Sven's corruption claims? As for Gabe’s post, just a pathetic attempt to embarrass. Talk about sad and disrespectful. Since you have no shame Gabe, I will feel embarrassed for you.
I don’t know much about Tonia Reyes-Uranga, but the fact that her most vocal supporters are a bunch of sniveling crybabies with nothing better to do in the middle of the night than write slanderous blog posts doesn’t fill me with much hope for her candidacy. Maybe if they got a little more sleep they could do something useful for the campaign, like stuffing envelopes.
Should people like Gabe and Andy post their full names?
And if they did how would we know if those were even their real names?
In fact, how do we know that Mr. Jake isn't named after his mother's favorite brother, Bathhouse, and that he's the only one here being truthful???
For that matter, what are you trying to hide..."David?"