<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The District Weekly - Latest Comments in FROM LBREPORT.COM: SCHIPSKE&amp;#8217;S UNPRECEDENTED PROPOSAL WOULD HARNESS PORT&amp;#8217;S ECONOMIC ENGINE FOR TRUE PUBLIC BENEFIT | The District Weekly</title><link>http://districtweekly.disqus.com/</link><description>News, Arts, Entertainment &amp; More for Long Beach, Huntington Beach, and Costa Mesa</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:51:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: FROM LBREPORT.COM: SCHIPSKE&amp;#8217;S UNPRECEDENTED PROPOSAL WOULD HARNESS PORT&amp;#8217;S ECONOMIC ENGINE FOR TRUE PUBLIC BENEFIT | The District Weekly</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/daily/writing-shotgun/from-lbreportcom-schipskes-unprecedented-ballot-proposal-would-harness-ports-economic-engine-for-true-public-benefit/#comment-1361441</link><description>And dummies like me that can not spell anonymous correctly should not be taken seriously.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dwight K. Snider</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:51:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FROM LBREPORT.COM: SCHIPSKE&amp;#8217;S UNPRECEDENTED PROPOSAL WOULD HARNESS PORT&amp;#8217;S ECONOMIC ENGINE FOR TRUE PUBLIC BENEFIT | The District Weekly</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/daily/writing-shotgun/from-lbreportcom-schipskes-unprecedented-ballot-proposal-would-harness-ports-economic-engine-for-true-public-benefit/#comment-1361440</link><description>I tend to feel like you, Dwight, unless people have a very good reason -- usually, something to do with job security or retribution -- for keeping their identities anonymous.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Wielenga</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:34:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FROM LBREPORT.COM: SCHIPSKE&amp;#8217;S UNPRECEDENTED PROPOSAL WOULD HARNESS PORT&amp;#8217;S ECONOMIC ENGINE FOR TRUE PUBLIC BENEFIT | The District Weekly</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/daily/writing-shotgun/from-lbreportcom-schipskes-unprecedented-ballot-proposal-would-harness-ports-economic-engine-for-true-public-benefit/#comment-1361439</link><description>I suggest that people who post anonomous comments are smucks. It is my opinion that their comments are frivilous and without merit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dwight K. Snider</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:11:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FROM LBREPORT.COM: SCHIPSKE&amp;#8217;S UNPRECEDENTED PROPOSAL WOULD HARNESS PORT&amp;#8217;S ECONOMIC ENGINE FOR TRUE PUBLIC BENEFIT | The District Weekly</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/daily/writing-shotgun/from-lbreportcom-schipskes-unprecedented-ballot-proposal-would-harness-ports-economic-engine-for-true-public-benefit/#comment-1361438</link><description>I suggest, that Juan, learn the proper, use, of commas.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:22:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FROM LBREPORT.COM: SCHIPSKE&amp;#8217;S UNPRECEDENTED PROPOSAL WOULD HARNESS PORT&amp;#8217;S ECONOMIC ENGINE FOR TRUE PUBLIC BENEFIT | The District Weekly</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/daily/writing-shotgun/from-lbreportcom-schipskes-unprecedented-ballot-proposal-would-harness-ports-economic-engine-for-true-public-benefit/#comment-1361437</link><description>Finally, a councilmember takes on an appropriate task. Why shouldn't port revenues be allowed to help with city finances? They're part of the Long Beach community. Also, they have a healthy reserve fund. I believe, the ports contribution to the city is far below what it should be. I suggest, all Long Beach city councilmembers should support Gerrie Shipske's proposal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JuanPardell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:20:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>