-
Website
http://thedistrictweekly.com/ -
Original page
http://thedistrictweekly.com/daily/writing-shotgun/they-call-him-mr-dibs-but-you-can-call-him-mr-candidate/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
PatBryant
105 comments · 1 points
-
howardx
1155 comments · 401 points
-
Sam_Lowry
73 comments · 15 points
-
Fisch
77 comments · 25 points
-
Dwight K Snider
163 comments · 14 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
TWO JOBS FOR ONE MONEY
1 day ago · 27 comments
-
DEADLY FORCE
6 days ago · 129 comments
-
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR CRAIG BECK HAS BEEN REASSIGNED
4 days ago · 54 comments
-
IN 2004, GABELICH, REYES URANGA & RICHARDSON TOOK AN EXCELLENT VACATION, TOO
1 week ago · 90 comments
-
P-T: RDA HEAD CRAIG BECK PLACED ON ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
1 week ago · 108 comments
-
TWO JOBS FOR ONE MONEY
My problem with Laura is that her style seems to be not to do anything until it's a crisis. That's no way to run your personal finances, and it's definitely no way to run Congress, though unfortunately surprisingly in style these days.
So what do we know of this man Dibs?
As for Dibs and Mathews, I'm not buying into the angry mob fervor cooked up by those trying to sell news (sorry DW). Neither of those guys are qualified or fit to serve in the U.S. Congress. Like her or not, Laura is a strong, competent representative who can deliver for Long Beach.
You shouldn't let your emotions get you carried away. My point about Richardson being strong and competent are based on the fact that she has held elected office for the past eight years. She has legislative and political experience, and a track record of accomplishments. And most importantly, she has developed relationships in Long Beach, Sacramento and Washington D.C. that are necessary to be effective in getting the job done.
I agree, her personal finances are a mess, and she is to blame. She made quite a few ill advised, irresponsible and risky decisions to win her elections. But when I weigh what's best for the greater good of my city and community, I wouldn't risk my vote on a neophyte substitute teacher (a republican with too much time on his hands) or on a suspcious snake oil salemans who has been running for the same office for almost twenty years. Laura still has my vote for now!
The shame of it all is that she's unopposed this November with the exception of write- ins. She's nothing if not lucky. Just the same, I'd MUCH rather have a wacky substitute teacher than her. Hell, I'd rather have Bill Pearl run, but he's too busy being wacky in his own write.
[By the way, I recall how her avowed mentor Juanita's fliers used to brag about federal bucks brought to this area - and had nothing to say about whether her proposals and policy votes were any good (or made any difference) for the state or nation or world at large - or for that matter whether the extra local federal bucks were really financing useful stuff for us, as versus more port pollution.]
I remember one of Laura's great performances - zeniths for some, nadirs for the rest of us - in the LB Council, where she went to great lengths to stop a resolution by Bonnie et al on the proposed LNG terminal that merely declared a presumption that is already written into law, namely that a farther-away LNG terminal would be safer for us than a nearer one. Laura made sure that the resolution would simply say that the Council was concerned about safety - whatever that could mean.
Yes, the real issue is indeed the greater good of the community. That's why we can be very glad we have a choice now.
Yes, Dibs had a summer break from school and decided to use it to do this bit of civics. Bravo!
Yes, unlike Laura, Dibs has many articulate and evidently sincere and unmasked opinions. One is bound to disagree with some. For instance, I greatly disagree with his pseudo-progressive party-line on Iranian nukes. Just because other countries have nukes, and moreover the Bush regime has systematically lied and warmongered, does NOT make the Iranian regime noble (or even fit for this millennium), or their nukes a good or even very tolerable idea. It's the Iranian chief of state who has openly said he wants Israel destroyed (not vice versa). His govt. already sponsors hoodlum regimes in S. Lebanon and Gaza, featuring suicide killers that - even without nuclear weapons yet to hurl - are not impressed by the kind of deterrence that kept the Cold War from getting hot.
So Dibs is not an ideal alternative. But, at least he was able to rethink a lot of former opinion to change from Republican, while retaining one of the few virtues Republicans used to focus on, fiscal sobriety. Presumably he retains the ability to rethink further while staying fiscally sober.
He says some pretty commonsense things...and I think that's what our city and country really need: common sense.
Makes me wish I was in the 37th District side of town so I could vote for him.
But, of course, short of Richardson being caught on camera eating a live infant, nothing is going to change, the status quo will be upheld, and Laura will be our representative for life, until she dies in office, like our last Rep.
There are too many people in this world utterly disinterested in politics, yet they continue to mark the boxes labeled (D) and (R) out of force of habit.