<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The District Weekly - Latest Comments in CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://districtweekly.disqus.com/</link><description>News, Arts, Entertainment &amp; More for Long Beach, Huntington Beach, and Costa Mesa</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:42:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/closing-the-book-on-main-library/#comment-2095386</link><description>If the building is that bad off, it makes sense to start anew. However, they really should have a plan in place as to the building of a new library and what they plan to do for the citizens in the meantime. Since transportation is an issue, I wonder if doing a temporary deliver/pickup service of books would be too expensive? Patrons can file requests via Internet or phone?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mary Hill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:42:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/closing-the-book-on-main-library/#comment-2052315</link><description>This is NOT an emergency situation-- why close a library with no plans/financing/site in place?&lt;br&gt;You are disenrfranchsing about 20,000+ downtown people who use MAIN as their neighborhood library. It seems irresponsible to close a library with no alternative in place</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Farmer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:29:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/closing-the-book-on-main-library/#comment-1391918</link><description>Let's see, Patrick West, the architect of buying out Acres of Books for $2.8 million of your tax dollars, wants to close the main library in favor of a public/private developer arrangement...in other words, more giveaways to developers and less library for you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sure the RDA's budget for unchecked spending will continue while libraries, parks, and anything else that isn't protected by corrupt city interests are closed or sold off .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">otay90</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/closing-the-book-on-main-library/#comment-1391911</link><description>I spent a lot of time at the library when I was unemployed and passing the time with my head in a book.  Wait, that sounds like half the population of Main library users.  Although I've adopted a new biblioteca, I am so sad to hear of this ones passing but maybe the new construction won't have the same pseudo-uncomfortable effect of Ayn Rand-esque architecture looming over transients relaxing on the grass.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/closing-the-book-on-main-library/#comment-1391917</link><description>If it has been leaking since day one isn't that something to take up with the architect and contractor?  Where was the city on that one?  If someone built our houses like that we would sue and they would fix it.  Where was the city on that one?  Also, hasn't the city saved millions of dollars over the years by not fixing it?  So, spend it now.  It should have already been done.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the concrete planters are too heavy get a crane and remove them.  That seems simple enough to do to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't see them clsoing down city hall.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kdog</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:38:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/closing-the-book-on-main-library/#comment-1391916</link><description>“Off…” (5) and JB (6): As I understand it, Mr. West is proposing the elimination of 10 positions in the current Economic Development Bureau (EDB), arguably saving us about $1 million, then adding the responsibilities for the new “Municipal Cultural Affairs” entity to those of the remaining Economic Development Bureau employees.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The name of the proposed entity is a bit confusing since, organizationally speaking, you wouldn’t have one Bureau within another. More than likely Municipal Cultural Affairs would become a Division within the EDB or EDB might possibly be re-named “Economic Development and Municipal Cultural Affairs Bureau.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any case, if my information is accurate, we wont be spending any more for this program…</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John_B</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:41:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/closing-the-book-on-main-library/#comment-1391915</link><description>#5--I couldn't agree more...."Cultural Affairs Bureau?" &lt;br&gt;Sounds like BS. We already have ways of procuring and distributing funding for the arts. The city needs to drop this idea.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LB_City_Girl</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:18:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/closing-the-book-on-main-library/#comment-1391914</link><description>And NOW the city is pushing to expend millions on a Cultural Affairs Bureau? What will it take to get a mob outside of City Hall? How crazy are these politicians?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Off with their heads!</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:50:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/closing-the-book-on-main-library/#comment-1391913</link><description>Remember that the same firm, architects Hugh and Donald Gibbs, designed the Gerald Daniel Concert Hall at Cal State Long Beach, which collapse at 10:30 AM, July 2, 1990.  Has any civic inquiry been made into the mistakes made in the library building?  Bill Weber</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill Weber</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/closing-the-book-on-main-library/#comment-1391912</link><description>hey, how about  a freedom of information request to see if anyone has submitted or proposed any developments for that area?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Russ Roca</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 03:09:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/closing-the-book-on-main-library/#comment-1391910</link><description>Why not move the library to The Pike? There's still plenty of vacant space. Better yet, why not have a floating library on the Queen Mary?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Juan Pardell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:05:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CLOSING THE BOOK ON MAIN LIBRARY?</title><link>http://thedistrictweekly.com/print/news/closing-the-book-on-main-library/#comment-1391909</link><description>Get these people away from our public properties. Get them away from the city accounts. Get them out of office and preferably out of town. I've heard enough bullshit now. Stop these scummy thieves before we have nothing left.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kaiser Sosa</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:46:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>